Experts Weigh In On Harambe’s Last Moments

The tragic event involving Harambe, the 17-year-old western lowland gorilla, at the Cincinnati Zoo sparked a global conversation about zoo safety, animal behavior, and human responsibility. On May 28, 2016, a young boy climbed into the gorilla’s enclosure, leading to a series of events that ended in Harambe’s death. Experts across various fields have since weighed in on what happened that day and the implications it has for both animal conservation and human interaction with wildlife.

Primatologists have analyzed the footage of Harambe’s interactions with the child, noting that gorillas often show curiosity and protective behavior towards young ones, whether gorilla or human. Some believe Harambe’s actions were misinterpreted as aggressive when they may have been an attempt to protect the child. This incident has led to discussions on how zoos can better design enclosures to prevent such occurrences and whether the use of tranquilizers over lethal force was a viable option.

On the other hand, animal behaviorists have highlighted the challenges faced by zoo staff in this situation. The decision to use lethal force was made to ensure the child’s immediate safety, as tranquilizers can take time to render an animal unconscious, during which the unpredictable behavior could pose a risk. This has led to debates about the ethical considerations of keeping large, powerful animals in captivity and the protocols in place for emergency situations.

Conservationists argue that incidents like Harambe’s highlight the need for increased public education on wildlife and the importance of respecting barriers designed to protect both humans and animals. They stress the importance of supporting conservation efforts that focus on preserving wildlife habitats in the wild, reducing the need for zoos to house such large animals in artificial environments.

In conclusion, Harambe’s last moments have left a profound impact on how society views the role of zoos, the interpretation of animal behavior, and the steps required to prevent similar tragedies. The incident serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between human curiosity and the responsibility to protect the world’s wildlife.

Related Posts

No Image

My mother-in-law invited the relatives to open the envelope with the paternity test results in front of them: she didn’t expect such revenge from me

19 September 2025 lemon news 0

My mother-in-law invited all the relatives to expose me and prove that I didn’t have the baby by her son. She had done a DNA test and decided to open the envelope in front of the guests. — According to the paternity test… the boy really is my son’s child, — my mother-in-law announced with a displeased face. Everyone sighed in relief, and I stood up from my seat: — Dear relatives, now that we’ve cleared that up, I want to open another envelope. My mother-in-law went pale. — No. Don’t. Please, — she said quietly, but it was already too late. I opened the envelope and… Continued in the first comment  I never thought I’d have to prove my husband’s faithfulness — not through actions, not through trust, but through paper. Through soulless letters and numbers that either save or destroy. My mother-in-law stood in front of me, arms crossed over her chest, lips pressed into a thin line. — We have to be sure. You see, it’s our family name. And you… you used to date that… Artyom. She pronounced my ex’s name as if he were a curse. I glanced at my husband. He didn’t look me in the eyes. — It’s not about distrust, just… Let’s close this matter once and for all. Pain burned in my chest. — Fine. But then you also take the test. To be fair. — That’s too much. — No, — I was firm. — If we’re playing blood test, we play fair. Three weeks passed. We got the results, and my mother-in-law proudly organized a “family evening.” Everyone gathered: my husband’s brothers, aunts, cousins. — Well, […]

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*